Carmen – I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. Not every article has to be 100% practical and how-to oriented. Some pieces can exist purely for entertainment value, and simply to list “The top 5″ of whatever topic. We’ve published plenty of posts like that here before. Also, I have no idea what “pretension” you’re referring to. I can only assume that it was a rude and unnecessary jab at Noel, something that has NO place here.

I have to second Iris’ comments. I would have loved to see you bring some of your immense talent to collegefashion.net, but I keep getting the impression that you are more suited to blogging about yourself than actually writing a coherent piece that appeals to the audience. What are w supposed to do with top 5 celebrity hairstyles? Why are you writing about these hairstyles if you admittedly know nothing about hair and cannot give us tips on how to execute them? Try writing about something you know without being pretentious about it. Still waiting for a good article from you.

I will have to see how my hair does when pushed in a more sexy, just got out of bed, kind of direction.

P.S. I just found it a harsh transition, because I believe the purpose of that panel was to educate women about society’s influence on hairstyle, and how it represents a section of conformity. Unless you were writing this article as a way to suggest featuring your own “signature style,” the idea of writing an article on “Top Celebrity Hairstyles” just seems unnecessarily conformist and exacting to the standards set by the media. Perhaps next time, you could better clarify what you mean by a “finding a unique and signature hairstyle,” instead of giving 5 looks and hoping that the reader would come away with the right impression.